Hofstede's I-C Dimension as Predictive of Allocative Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis
There is a growing consensus in the scholarly and practitioner literature that theories of management do not always translate simply and universally. Using meta-analytic techniques, we explore Hofstede’s (1980) prediction that aculture’s score on individualism-collectivism will be associated with a...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Proquest
2000
|
| Em: |
International journal of value-based management
Ano: 2000, Volume: 13, Número: 2, Páginas: 173-188 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Cross-cultural
B Distributive Justice B Hofstede B individualism-collectivism B Meta-analysis |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | There is a growing consensus in the scholarly and practitioner literature that theories of management do not always translate simply and universally. Using meta-analytic techniques, we explore Hofstede’s (1980) prediction that aculture’s score on individualism-collectivism will be associated with a normative preference for certain distributive justice principles. Findings indicate that in individualistic countries the preference favors the equity rule over equality or need in reward allocation. Conversely, in relatively collectivistic societies equality or need is emphasized. Moreover, in collectivistic societies the equity rule appears to be preferred with out-group members and equality or need with-in group. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8528 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: International journal of value-based management
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1023/A:1007838221341 |