God is (Probably) a Cause among Causes: Why the Primary/Secondary Cause Distinction Doesn’t Help in Developing Non-interventionist Accounts of Special Divine Action

Several recent authors have suggested that much of the discussion on divine action is flawed since it presupposes that divine and human agency compete. Such authors advocate a re-appropriation of the Scholastic distinction between primary and secondary causation which, it is suggested, solves many p...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kittle, Simon (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2022
In: Theology and science
Year: 2022, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 247-262
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Divine Action
B divine concurrence
B primary causation
B special divine action
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1801705186
003 DE-627
005 20240228170541.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220513s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/14746700.2022.2057468  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1801705186 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1801705186 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kittle, Simon  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a God is (Probably) a Cause among Causes: Why the Primary/Secondary Cause Distinction Doesn’t Help in Developing Non-interventionist Accounts of Special Divine Action 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Several recent authors have suggested that much of the discussion on divine action is flawed since it presupposes that divine and human agency compete. Such authors advocate a re-appropriation of the Scholastic distinction between primary and secondary causation which, it is suggested, solves many problems in the theology of divine action. This article critiques defences of the primary/secondary cause distinction based on appeals to analogical predication, and argues that, even assuming an adequate account of the primary/secondary cause distinction, the distinction provides no help in the development of non-interventionist accounts of special divine action. 
601 |a Special 
650 4 |a divine concurrence 
650 4 |a primary causation 
650 4 |a special divine action 
650 4 |a Divine Action 
652 |a AB:NBC 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Theology and science  |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003  |g 20(2022), 2, Seite 247-262  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372546447  |w (DE-600)2124364-5  |w (DE-576)261325019  |x 1474-6719  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:247-262 
856 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14746700.2022.2057468?needAccess=true  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2022.2057468  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4133765559 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1801705186 
LOK |0 005 20240228170541 
LOK |0 008 220513||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-05-12#806CA3E4F6BEB491E6065FD5738176A7BD81C0D4 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL