God is (Probably) a Cause among Causes: Why the Primary/Secondary Cause Distinction Doesn’t Help in Developing Non-interventionist Accounts of Special Divine Action
Several recent authors have suggested that much of the discussion on divine action is flawed since it presupposes that divine and human agency compete. Such authors advocate a re-appropriation of the Scholastic distinction between primary and secondary causation which, it is suggested, solves many p...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
2022
|
| Dans: |
Theology and science
Année: 2022, Volume: 20, Numéro: 2, Pages: 247-262 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Divine Action
B divine concurrence B primary causation B special divine action |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Several recent authors have suggested that much of the discussion on divine action is flawed since it presupposes that divine and human agency compete. Such authors advocate a re-appropriation of the Scholastic distinction between primary and secondary causation which, it is suggested, solves many problems in the theology of divine action. This article critiques defences of the primary/secondary cause distinction based on appeals to analogical predication, and argues that, even assuming an adequate account of the primary/secondary cause distinction, the distinction provides no help in the development of non-interventionist accounts of special divine action. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2022.2057468 |