Solomon and Ashmedai Redux: Redaction Criticism of bGitin 68b

This paper deals with the redaction criticism of a story from the Babylonian Talmud, bGit 68b. This study aims to distinguish further between the diverse sources of this complex narrative and to differentiate between the Eastern and Western elements that it contains. The conclusion is that the unusu...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Kiperwasser, Reuven (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Penn Press 2021
Dans: The Jewish quarterly review
Année: 2021, Volume: 111, Numéro: 1, Pages: 21-54
Sujets non-standardisés:B Demonology
B Redaction Criticism
B wild rooster (tarnegola bara)
B ring of Solomon
B Babylonia
B Narratives
B Magic
B Roman Palestine
B Angels
B King Solomon
B Ashmedai
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:This paper deals with the redaction criticism of a story from the Babylonian Talmud, bGit 68b. This study aims to distinguish further between the diverse sources of this complex narrative and to differentiate between the Eastern and Western elements that it contains. The conclusion is that the unusually long story in bGitin is a product of a late and tendentious editing. It is based on a minimum of three once-independent narrative traditions. The first told of how King Solomon built the Temple with the help of a friendly demon; the second told of how King Solomon built the Temple with the help of a miraculous object called shamira. It seems that these stories were in competition with each other; that is, one of them clearly appeared as an antithesis to the other. The late editor decided to harmonize them, transforming the two tales into a single story about how a friendly demon built the Temple with the help of a miraculous object. This composite story served as an introduction to the third narrative tradition, mobilized by the editor. According to this account, the throne of King Solomon was captured by an insidious demon, and the king went into exile. Blending the story of how a friendly demon built the Temple with one about how the throne was usurped by an evil demon was the last stage in the tortuous emergence of this extraordinary tale.
ISSN:1553-0604
Contient:Enthalten in: The Jewish quarterly review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/jqr.2021.0002