Pantheistic versus Participatory Christologies: A Critical Analysis of Richard Rohr’s in Light of Thomas Aquinas’s
This essay will present Richard Rohr’s central claims about Jesus Christ and the presence of God in creation and then consider them in light of Aquinas’s teachings with particular attention to his Commentary on John. This essay attempts to show that Rohr’s claims are incomplete and ultimately misgui...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Sciendo
2021
|
| Dans: |
European journal for the study of Thomas Aquinas
Année: 2021, Volume: 39, Numéro: 1, Pages: 1-23 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | KAE Moyen Âge central KAJ Époque contemporaine NBF Christologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Incarnation
B Pantheism B Christology B Thomas Aquinas B Richard Rohr |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | This essay will present Richard Rohr’s central claims about Jesus Christ and the presence of God in creation and then consider them in light of Aquinas’s teachings with particular attention to his Commentary on John. This essay attempts to show that Rohr’s claims are incomplete and ultimately misguided and that Aquinas’s participatory account of creation and the Incarnation allows him to cultivate an awareness of God’s presence in all of creation while also maintaining the salvific uniqueness of the Incarnation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2657-3555 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: European journal for the study of Thomas Aquinas
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2478/ejsta-2021-0001 |