A Thomistic Defense of "Nature" in Avicenna’s Physics
Avicenna offers a novel definition of "nature" as a power in his Physics of the Healing. Some have seen in this redefinition a radical departure from Aristotle. James Weisheipl, for one, rejected Avicenna’s definition as a mistaken interpretation of Aristotle and as a position incompatible...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Sciendo
2021
|
| En: |
European journal for the study of Thomas Aquinas
Año: 2021, Volumen: 39, Número: 1, Páginas: 43-60 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | KAE Edad Media Central TG Edad Media Central VA Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Avicenna
B Nature B Hylomorphism B Causality B Power |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | Avicenna offers a novel definition of "nature" as a power in his Physics of the Healing. Some have seen in this redefinition a radical departure from Aristotle. James Weisheipl, for one, rejected Avicenna’s definition as a mistaken interpretation of Aristotle and as a position incompatible with Thomas Aquinas. In Weisheipl’s view, Avicenna reifies form into a kind of motor of the natural being, a conception earlier rejected by Thomas Aquinas in several works. In this study, I offer a Thomistic defense of Avicenna by investigating the definition of nature and its relation to matter and form. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2657-3555 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: European journal for the study of Thomas Aquinas
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2478/ejsta-2021-0003 |