A Thomistic Defense of "Nature" in Avicenna’s Physics
Avicenna offers a novel definition of "nature" as a power in his Physics of the Healing. Some have seen in this redefinition a radical departure from Aristotle. James Weisheipl, for one, rejected Avicenna’s definition as a mistaken interpretation of Aristotle and as a position incompatible...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Sciendo
2021
|
| Dans: |
European journal for the study of Thomas Aquinas
Année: 2021, Volume: 39, Numéro: 1, Pages: 43-60 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | KAE Moyen Âge central TG Moyen Âge central VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Avicenna
B Nature B Hylomorphism B Causality B Power |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Avicenna offers a novel definition of "nature" as a power in his Physics of the Healing. Some have seen in this redefinition a radical departure from Aristotle. James Weisheipl, for one, rejected Avicenna’s definition as a mistaken interpretation of Aristotle and as a position incompatible with Thomas Aquinas. In Weisheipl’s view, Avicenna reifies form into a kind of motor of the natural being, a conception earlier rejected by Thomas Aquinas in several works. In this study, I offer a Thomistic defense of Avicenna by investigating the definition of nature and its relation to matter and form. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2657-3555 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: European journal for the study of Thomas Aquinas
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2478/ejsta-2021-0003 |