Sacrificial Fathers and the Death of Their Children: How the Story of Job Challenges the Priestly Tradition

Job’s burnt offerings for his sons and daughters followed by their death (Job 1) resembles the sequence of Aaron’s burnt offerings for himself and his sons followed by the death of his oldest sons (Lev 8-10). Within this common sequence of events, the two stories share a cluster of important, identi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Awabdy, Mark A. 1981- (VerfasserIn) ; Häner, Tobias 1978- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Cambridge Univ. Press 2022
In: Harvard theological review
Jahr: 2022, Band: 115, Heft: 2, Seiten: 149-170
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Bibel. Ijob 1-2 / Bibel. Levitikus 8-10 / Intertextualität / Priester
IxTheo Notationen:HB Altes Testament
RB Kirchliches Amt; Gemeinde
weitere Schlagwörter:B cult and ritual
B Intertextuality
B Allusion
B Leviticus
B Job
B Job as priest
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Job’s burnt offerings for his sons and daughters followed by their death (Job 1) resembles the sequence of Aaron’s burnt offerings for himself and his sons followed by the death of his oldest sons (Lev 8-10). Within this common sequence of events, the two stories share a cluster of important, identical lexemes. Although it is not impossible that these features could have resulted unintentionally from a shared scribal culture, the textual evidence is strong enough to indicate that the scribe of Job’s prologue alludes to the priestly inauguration story of Leviticus 8-10. By reading Job after Leviticus, one sees the sharp contrast between the divine silence following Job’s intermediary sacrifices (Job 1:5, 18-19) and the divine response both to Aaron’s and to Nadab and Abihu’s sacrifices (Lev 9:22-10:3). This study clarifies how the story of Job rejects a mechanistic understanding not only of traditional wisdom, but of the Priestly cultic tradition of ancient Israel and Judah.
ISSN:1475-4517
Enthält:Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S001781602200013X