RT Article
T1 The fairness of ventilator allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic
JF Bioethics
VO 36
IS 6
SP 715
OP 723
A1 Wang, Xueshi
LA English
PB Wiley-Blackwell
YR 2022
UL https://www.ixtheo.de/Record/1807169057
AB There is ongoing debate on how to fairly allocate scarce critical care resources to patients with COVID-19. The debate revolves around two views: those who believe that priority for scarce resources should primarily aim at saving the most lives (SML) or at saving the most life-years, and those who believe that public health should focus on health equity to address health disparities and social determinants of health. I argue that maximizing medical outcomes by saving the greatest number of patients is not a plausible strategy for combating COVID-19. There are reasons of fairness to give each patient who can meet general eligibility requirements a chance of being saved. Rather than focusing on outcome maximization, a better solution would be the individualist lottery that takes account of probability of survival and duration of treatment. Although the individualist lottery allocates scarce resources in a fair way that is responsive to health equity concerns, it still gives considerable weight to the concern of SML. Thus, this procedure can be reasonably accepted by all key stakeholders.
K1 ventilator allocation
K1 the individualist lottery
K1 Fairness
K1 Covid-19
DO 10.1111/bioe.12955