Necessity, Rights, and Rationing in Compulsory Research

In “Compulsory Research in Learning Health Care: Against a Minimal Risk Limit,” Robert Steel offers an argument in favor of compelling individuals to participate in some research that poses more than minimal risk. In his view, the ethics of compulsory research turns on questions of fair distribution...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Schaefer, G. Owen (Author) ; Muralidharan, Anantharaman (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley 2022
In: The Hastings Center report
Year: 2022, Volume: 52, Issue: 3, Pages: 31-33
Further subjects:B compulsion
B Participation
B Rationing
B Rights
B Bioethics
B Necessity
B Research
B research ethics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1808828321
003 DE-627
005 20230214112208.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220704s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.1394  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1808828321 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1808828321 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1250027330  |0 (DE-627)1786854082  |4 aut  |a Schaefer, G. Owen 
109 |a Schaefer, G. Owen 
245 1 0 |a Necessity, Rights, and Rationing in Compulsory Research 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In “Compulsory Research in Learning Health Care: Against a Minimal Risk Limit,” Robert Steel offers an argument in favor of compelling individuals to participate in some research that poses more than minimal risk. In his view, the ethics of compulsory research turns on questions of fair distribution of benefits and burdens, within a paradigm analogous to health care resource rationing. We do not dispute that it may theoretically be permissible to compel participation in certain circumstances, including those that rise above minimal risk. Nevertheless, Steel's argument for this conclusion faces several challenges that ultimately render it unconvincing in its present form. First, compulsion should be subject to a “necessity” criterion, which substantially limits its applicable scope. Second, compulsion is a prima facie rights violation that requires stronger ethical justification than Steel offers. And third, substantial structural and motivational differences between rationing and compulsion render the analogy inapt. 
650 4 |a Bioethics 
650 4 |a research ethics 
650 4 |a Rationing 
650 4 |a Necessity 
650 4 |a Rights 
650 4 |a Participation 
650 4 |a Research 
650 4 |a compulsion 
700 1 |a Muralidharan, Anantharaman  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 52(2022), 3, Seite 31-33  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:52  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g pages:31-33 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1394  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.1394  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 52  |j 2022  |e 3  |h 31-33 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4160715753 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1808828321 
LOK |0 005 20230214112208 
LOK |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-30#3A85A785378DCC5D3C1B670D6D3AC54E98C4F880 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x HK 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw