RT Article
T1 The Problem of God in the Presence of Grief: Exchanging “Stages” of Healing for “Trajectories” of Recovery
JF Journal of spiritual formation & soul care
VO 9
IS 2
SP 176
OP 193
A1 Maxwell, Paul
A1 Perrine, John
LA English
PB Sage Publishing
YR 2016
UL https://www.ixtheo.de/Record/1809856159
AB The bereaved Christian faces not only the difficult task of grief, but also the morally charged evaluations of the grief process: whether it should be fast or slow, whether God is necessary or unhelpful, and whether grief is “proper” for Christians in light of their call to “not grieve as others do who have no hope” (1 Thess. 4:13).1 This article (1) showcases these tensions involved in defining a “proper” Christian approach to grief, (2) retrieves resources born in the engagement of similarly problematic tensions in the field of grief theory, and (3) conscripts these resources in order to read the book of Job through a new lens, which relieves some of the tensions which arise in Christian considerations of grief. In sum, Christians commonly read the book of Job through the “stage model” of grief –- as if Job's experience throughout the book conforms to and requires a logically sequential grief-progress. Conversely, a “trajectory model” of grief, a new advancement in grief theory, opens the door for reading each pericope in Job as supplying a unique and independently legitimate path for grief that does not require any preceding or subsequent stages. In the same way that Job accommodates these variegated trajectories of grief, so also the Christian faith entertains equally legitimate grief trajectories, each appropriate for the various felt needs of the bereaved.
DO 10.1177/193979091600900204