RELIGIOUS STUDIES BY THE RELIGIOUS: A DISCUSSION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEOLOGY AND THE SCIENCE OF RELIGION

As the study of religion in Africa is undertaken increasingly by African scholars, we can assume that many producing academic research in this field will themselves be religious. This calls for a renewed discussion of the relationship between theology and the science of religion. The science of reli...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cox, James L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: ASRSA 1994
In: Journal for the study of religion
Year: 1994, Volume: 7, Issue: 2, Pages: 3-31
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1814487565
003 DE-627
005 20220817052656.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220817s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1814487565 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1814487565 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cox, James L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a RELIGIOUS STUDIES BY THE RELIGIOUS: A DISCUSSION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEOLOGY AND THE SCIENCE OF RELIGION 
264 1 |c 1994 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a As the study of religion in Africa is undertaken increasingly by African scholars, we can assume that many producing academic research in this field will themselves be religious. This calls for a renewed discussion of the relationship between theology and the science of religion. The science of religion has been defended as a unique discipline traditionally by phenomenologists such as C.J. Bleeker and systematic scientists of religion like Th. P. van Baaren. Recently, however, Robert Segal and Donald Wiebe have asserted that religion is not an autonomous subject; in its religionist form, it is best described as theology, and in its scientific form, it is best dealt with in the social sciences. This article argues that (1) the Segal-Wiebe position misrepresents as unscientific the religionist emphasis on the perspective of believers; and (2) Segal and Wiebe advance a dialectical as opposed to a dialogical approach for understanding religion. The religiousness of the African, therefore, must not provide an excuse for absorbing the science of religion into theology, nor, however, should arguments like those of Segal and Wiebe convince us that such a fusion is inevitable. 
601 |a Theologe 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for the study of religion  |d [Pretoria] : ASRSA, 1988  |g 7(1994), 2, Seite 3-31  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618332448  |w (DE-600)2536916-7  |w (DE-576)477530001  |x 2413-3027  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:1994  |g number:2  |g pages:3-31 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1636768776  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/24764186  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 7  |j 1994  |e 2  |h 3-31 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4179916207 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1814487565 
LOK |0 005 20220817052656 
LOK |0 008 220817||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-07-11#B742C4182FBCFBCC9458F4423D61733119C513A1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL