Medicine, ethics and religion: rational or irrational?

Savulescu maintains that our paper, which encourages clinicians to honour requests for "inappropriate treatment" is prejudicial to his atheistic beliefs, and therefore wrong. In this paper we clarify and expand on our ideas, and respond to his assertion that medicine, ethics and atheism ar...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
Authors: Orr, R. D. (Author) ; Genesen, L. B. (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: BMJ Publ. 1998
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 1998, 卷: 24, 發布: 6, Pages: 385-387
在線閱讀: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
實物特徵
總結:Savulescu maintains that our paper, which encourages clinicians to honour requests for "inappropriate treatment" is prejudicial to his atheistic beliefs, and therefore wrong. In this paper we clarify and expand on our ideas, and respond to his assertion that medicine, ethics and atheism are objective, rational and true, while religion is irrational and false.
ISSN:1473-4257
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of medical ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1136/jme.24.6.385