Self-Knowledge and Its Limits

A philosophical account of self-knowledge should offer more than an epistemological explanation of first-personal privilege. It should also address the many cases where the first-person perspective is not so privileged, and account for the importance of self-knowledge to a person’s social and psycho...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of moral philosophy
Main Author: Schwenkler, John (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2018
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Further subjects:B Agency
B Consciousness
B Rationality
B Psychology
B Self-knowledge
B Reasons
B Responsibility
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817469460
003 DE-627
005 20220927052950.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-01501005  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817469460 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817469460 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schwenkler, John  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Self-Knowledge and Its Limits 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A philosophical account of self-knowledge should offer more than an epistemological explanation of first-personal privilege. It should also address the many cases where the first-person perspective is not so privileged, and account for the importance of self-knowledge to a person’s social and psychological well-being. Quassim Cassam’s Self-Knowledge for Humans and John Doris’s Talking to Our Selves both emphasize the importance of these latter tasks, but neither author is wholly successful: Cassam’s argument rests on a gross distortion of the “Rationalist” picture he sets up as a foil, and Doris’s on a skeptical argument that stands in some questionable company. 
650 4 |a Psychology 
650 4 |a Consciousness 
650 4 |a Reasons 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a Rationality 
650 4 |a Agency 
650 4 |a Self-knowledge 
650 4 |a Psychology 
650 4 |a Consciousness 
650 4 |a Reasons 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a Rationality 
650 4 |a Agency 
650 4 |a Self-knowledge 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 15(2018), 1, Seite 85-95  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2018  |g number:1  |g pages:85-95 
856 |u https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A612003/datastream/PDF/view  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01501005  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/15/1/article-p85_85.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 15  |j 2018  |e 1  |h 85-95 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192062461 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817469460 
LOK |0 005 20220927052950 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-23#3DA30D6C47A2B6076A5BE448D5411183F83A680C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw