Security, Knowledge and Well-being

Abstract This paper investigates whether being “physically insecure” (being at risk of not continuing to meet one's physical needs in the future) should be thought of as a constituent of current wellbeing. In §1, it is argued that we cannot understand the value of security in terms of “freedom...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: John, Stephen (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Brill 2011
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Anno: 2011, Volume: 8, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 68-91
Altre parole chiave:B Well-being
B Epistemology
B CAPABILITIES
B SECURITY
B Risk
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 181747099X
003 DE-627
005 20220927052956.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/174552411X549363  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)181747099X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP181747099X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a John, Stephen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Security, Knowledge and Well-being 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract This paper investigates whether being “physically insecure” (being at risk of not continuing to meet one's physical needs in the future) should be thought of as a constituent of current wellbeing. In §1, it is argued that we cannot understand the value of security in terms of “freedom from fear”. In §2, it is argued that the reliablist approach to epistemology can help us to construct an account of why physical security is valuable, by relating security to the conditions of agency for practically and epistemically limited animals. In §3, this argument is compared with other attempts to understand the value of physical security. In §4, the relationship between security and threats of rights violation is clarified. In §5, the epistemic analogy of §2 is used to suggest a difference between the concepts of “security” and “capability”. 
601 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a Risk 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a SECURITY 
650 4 |a Well-being 
650 4 |a CAPABILITIES 
650 4 |a Risk 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a SECURITY 
650 4 |a Well-being 
650 4 |a CAPABILITIES 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 8(2011), 1, Seite 68-91  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2011  |g number:1  |g pages:68-91 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/174552411X549363  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/8/1/article-p68_5.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 8  |j 2011  |e 1  |h 68-91 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192063999 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 181747099X 
LOK |0 005 20220927052956 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#0D86895755DE60A0196226ED131A7B37C5C41868 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw