Egalitarian Justice and Valuational Judgment
Abstract Contemporary discussions of egalitarian justice have often focused on the issue of expensive taste. G.A. Cohen has recently abandoned the view that all chosen disadvantages are non-compensable, now maintaining that chosen expensive judgmental tastes—those endorsed by valuational judgment—ar...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2009
|
In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2009, Volume: 6, Issue: 4, Pages: 482-498 |
Further subjects: | B
Justice
B EXPENSIVE TASTE B CHOICE B Equality B G.A. COHEN B Responsibility |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1817471449 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220927052958.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220927s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/174046809X12464327133177 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1817471449 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1817471449 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Knight, Carl |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Knight, Carl | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Egalitarian Justice and Valuational Judgment |
264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract Contemporary discussions of egalitarian justice have often focused on the issue of expensive taste. G.A. Cohen has recently abandoned the view that all chosen disadvantages are non-compensable, now maintaining that chosen expensive judgmental tastes—those endorsed by valuational judgment—are compensable as it is unreasonable to expect persons not to develop them. But chosen expensive brute taste—the main type of non-compensable expensive taste on the new scheme—cannot be described in such a way that there is a normative difference between it and chosen expensive judgmental taste. As there are related problems with denying compensation for the other kind of expensive taste that might remain non-compensable, Cohen's position on taste appears to be either implausible or virtually indistinguishable from that of equality of welfare. However, compensation for valuational judgment-based expensive taste might be justified on grounds of responsibility. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Justice | |
650 | 4 | |a CHOICE | |
650 | 4 | |a G.A. COHEN | |
650 | 4 | |a Responsibility | |
650 | 4 | |a EXPENSIVE TASTE | |
650 | 4 | |a Equality | |
650 | 4 | |a Justice | |
650 | 4 | |a CHOICE | |
650 | 4 | |a G.A. COHEN | |
650 | 4 | |a Responsibility | |
650 | 4 | |a EXPENSIVE TASTE | |
650 | 4 | |a Equality | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 6(2009), 4, Seite 482-498 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2009 |g number:4 |g pages:482-498 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/174046809X12464327133177 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/6/4/article-p482_6.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 6 |j 2009 |e 4 |h 482-498 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4192064448 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1817471449 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220927052958 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#3EA0DBBA389363253EB3E2A4CE4DA7D66E8B665B | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |