Egalitarian Justice and Valuational Judgment

Abstract Contemporary discussions of egalitarian justice have often focused on the issue of expensive taste. G.A. Cohen has recently abandoned the view that all chosen disadvantages are non-compensable, now maintaining that chosen expensive judgmental tastes—those endorsed by valuational judgment—ar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Knight, Carl (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2009
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2009, Volume: 6, Issue: 4, Pages: 482-498
Further subjects:B Justice
B EXPENSIVE TASTE
B CHOICE
B Equality
B G.A. COHEN
B Responsibility
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817471449
003 DE-627
005 20220927052958.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/174046809X12464327133177  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817471449 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817471449 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Knight, Carl  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Knight, Carl 
245 1 0 |a Egalitarian Justice and Valuational Judgment 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract Contemporary discussions of egalitarian justice have often focused on the issue of expensive taste. G.A. Cohen has recently abandoned the view that all chosen disadvantages are non-compensable, now maintaining that chosen expensive judgmental tastes—those endorsed by valuational judgment—are compensable as it is unreasonable to expect persons not to develop them. But chosen expensive brute taste—the main type of non-compensable expensive taste on the new scheme—cannot be described in such a way that there is a normative difference between it and chosen expensive judgmental taste. As there are related problems with denying compensation for the other kind of expensive taste that might remain non-compensable, Cohen's position on taste appears to be either implausible or virtually indistinguishable from that of equality of welfare. However, compensation for valuational judgment-based expensive taste might be justified on grounds of responsibility. 
650 4 |a Justice 
650 4 |a CHOICE 
650 4 |a G.A. COHEN 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a EXPENSIVE TASTE 
650 4 |a Equality 
650 4 |a Justice 
650 4 |a CHOICE 
650 4 |a G.A. COHEN 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a EXPENSIVE TASTE 
650 4 |a Equality 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 6(2009), 4, Seite 482-498  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2009  |g number:4  |g pages:482-498 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/174046809X12464327133177  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/6/4/article-p482_6.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 6  |j 2009  |e 4  |h 482-498 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192064448 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817471449 
LOK |0 005 20220927052958 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#3EA0DBBA389363253EB3E2A4CE4DA7D66E8B665B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw