Particularism in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics*

In this essay I offer a new particularist reading of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. I argue that the interpretation I present not only helps us to resolve some puzzles about Aristotle’s goals and methods, but it also gives rise to a novel account of morality – an account that is both interesting an...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Leibowitz, Uri D. (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Brill 2013
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2013, 卷: 10, 發布: 2, Pages: 121-147
Further subjects:B Nicomachean Ethics
B Doctrine of the Mean
B Particularism
B Generalism
B Aristotle
在線閱讀: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817473115
003 DE-627
005 20220927053004.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/174552412X628904  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817473115 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817473115 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Leibowitz, Uri D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Particularism in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics* 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this essay I offer a new particularist reading of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. I argue that the interpretation I present not only helps us to resolve some puzzles about Aristotle’s goals and methods, but it also gives rise to a novel account of morality – an account that is both interesting and plausible in its own right. The goal of this paper is, in part, exegetical – that is, to figure out how to best understand the text of the Nicomachean Ethics. But this paper also aims to contribute to the current exciting and controversial debate over particularism. By taking the first steps towards a comprehensive particularist reading of Aristotle’s Ethics I hope to demonstrate that some of the mistrust of particularism is misplaced and that what is, perhaps, the most influential moral theory in the history of philosophy is, arguably, a particularist moral theory. 
650 4 |a Doctrine of the Mean 
650 4 |a Nicomachean Ethics 
650 4 |a Aristotle 
650 4 |a Generalism 
650 4 |a Particularism 
650 4 |a Doctrine of the Mean 
650 4 |a Nicomachean Ethics 
650 4 |a Aristotle 
650 4 |a Generalism 
650 4 |a Particularism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 10(2013), 2, Seite 121-147  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:2013  |g number:2  |g pages:121-147 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/174552412X628904  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/10/2/article-p121_1.xml  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 10  |j 2013  |e 2  |h 121-147 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192066114 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817473115 
LOK |0 005 20220927053004 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#C9F5940CAC7BBA3C759B25999E0C41C9DA9EA106 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw