Simple is as simple does: Plantinga and Ghazālī on divine simplicity
This study considers the notion of divine simplicity, the idea that God is not a composite of more basic features, and the criticisms by al-Ghazālī (d. 1111) and Alvin Plantinga of that doctrine. What is shown is that most of the argumentation against divine simplicity frequently credited to Plantin...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2022
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Anno: 2022, Volume: 58, Fascicolo: S1, Pagine: 97-109 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Ġazzālī, Abū-Ḥāmid Muḥammad Ibn-Muḥammad al- 1058-1111
/ Plantinga, Alvin 1932-
/ Semplicità di Dio
/ Ens necessarium
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AB Filosofia delle religioni NBC Dio |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Avicenna
B Divine Simplicity B Necessary Existent (wājib al-wujūd) B al-Ghazālī B Alvin Plantinga |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Riepilogo: | This study considers the notion of divine simplicity, the idea that God is not a composite of more basic features, and the criticisms by al-Ghazālī (d. 1111) and Alvin Plantinga of that doctrine. What is shown is that most of the argumentation against divine simplicity frequently credited to Plantinga had been nearly perfectly anticipated by al-Ghazālī. Moreover, in responding to a stronger form of divine simplicity, which Avicenna (d. 1037) had presented, than the Thomistic version that Plantinga attacks, Ghazālī develops ‘new’ arguments and moves that are still valuable and informative to the discussion of divine simplicity today. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412522000130 |