Neuplatonismus an der Universität Heidelberg?: Johannes Wenck († 1460) als Kommentator des Corpus Dionysiacum

John Wenck of Herrenberg († 1460), professor of theology at the University of Heidelberg, has been so far mostly known for his sharp controversy with Nicholas of Cusa († 1464). In his Apologia doctae ignorantiae, Cusanus posited an explicit opposition between Wenck’s Aristotelianism and the way of ‘...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meliadò, Mario (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2021
In: Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2021, Volume: 88, Issue: 1, Pages: 143-187
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822443660
003 DE-627
005 20221115052825.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c
024 7 |a 10.2143/RTPM.88.1.3289286  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822443660 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822443660 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ger 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Meliadò, Mario  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Neuplatonismus an der Universität Heidelberg?: Johannes Wenck († 1460) als Kommentator des Corpus Dionysiacum 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a John Wenck of Herrenberg († 1460), professor of theology at the University of Heidelberg, has been so far mostly known for his sharp controversy with Nicholas of Cusa († 1464). In his Apologia doctae ignorantiae, Cusanus posited an explicit opposition between Wenck’s Aristotelianism and the way of ‘learned ignorance’, representing the latter as rooted in the teaching of (Pseudo-)Dionysius the Areopagite and Plato. Challenging this rigid polemical scheme, which has often been uncritically adopted in modern scholarship, the present study focuses on Wenck’s reception of the Neoplatonic tradition and investigates, in particular, his unpublished and hitherto neglected commentaries on the works of Dionysius. Based on two manuscripts (BAV, Cod. Pal. lat. 149 and Cod. Pal. lat. 1590), the analysis reconstructs methods, sources, and doctrinal contents of Wenck’s exposition of the Corpus Dionysiacum. It sheds light on Wenck’s allegiance to Albert the Great, on his unconventional use of the writings of John Scotus Eriugena, and ultimately proposes a re-contextualization of Wenck’s intellectual project in the academic and humanistic culture of the 15th century.\n4207 \n4207 
601 |a Neuplatonismus 
601 |a Universität 
601 |a Heidelberg 
601 |a Universität Heidelberg 
601 |a Kommentator 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1997  |g 88(2021), 1, Seite 143-187  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)387427848  |w (DE-600)2145018-3  |w (DE-576)112775624  |x 1783-1717  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:88  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g pages:143-187 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.88.1.3289286  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3289286&journal_code=RTPM  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 88  |j 2021  |e 1  |h 143-187 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211087096 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822443660 
LOK |0 005 20221115052825 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-27#09D0A686A573F1CEE65A7726FEB51BD99E898463 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw