Competing authenticities: the appropriation of psalms in the festival “150 Psalms”
This article discusses a case study focusing on the appropriation of psalms in the choral festival “150 Psalms”. The authors observe a complex relationship between the festival, in which the psalms are appropriated as heritage, and attitudes regarding the religious traditions in which the psalms are...
Auteurs: | ; ; |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Carfax Publ.
2022
|
Dans: |
Journal of contemporary religion
Année: 2022, Volume: 37, Numéro: 3, Pages: 535-552 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bibel. Psalmen
/ Musique chorale
/ Festival
/ Kulturelle Aneignung
/ Tradition
/ Authenticité
/ Universalité
|
Classifications IxTheo: | AD Sociologie des religions AG Vie religieuse HA Bible RD Hymnologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Secularization
B political engagement B (choral) music B heritage studies B cultural festival |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | This article discusses a case study focusing on the appropriation of psalms in the choral festival “150 Psalms”. The authors observe a complex relationship between the festival, in which the psalms are appropriated as heritage, and attitudes regarding the religious traditions in which the psalms are rooted. Authenticity, a key concept in the field of heritage and cultural memory studies, is an important quality of the appropriation; however, this authenticity appeared to be constructed in a wide range of ways. Participants of the festival made different, competing claims regarding (in)authenticity, relating to ‘beauty’, ‘humanness’, ‘religiousness’, ‘relationship with God(s)’, political relevance’, and ‘ambiguity’. Discussing how these authenticities work in different individuals’ appropriation, the authors show that an authenticity built upon values of ‘human universality’, promoted by the festival organization, seems to have replaced an authenticity built upon ‘religiousness’, which the organizers assign to the realm of non-universal, individual experience. By signaling this tension, the authors conclude that ‘authenticity’ is a notion which is far more complex than extant theories on processes of collective ‘canonization’ suggest. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-9419 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of contemporary religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2022.2094114 |