Competing authenticities: the appropriation of psalms in the festival “150 Psalms”
This article discusses a case study focusing on the appropriation of psalms in the choral festival “150 Psalms”. The authors observe a complex relationship between the festival, in which the psalms are appropriated as heritage, and attitudes regarding the religious traditions in which the psalms are...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 载入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Carfax Publ.
2022
|
| In: |
Journal of contemporary religion
Year: 2022, 卷: 37, 发布: 3, Pages: 535-552 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bibel. Psalmen
/ 合唱音乐
/ 节庆表典
/ Kulturelle Aneignung
/ 传统
/ 真实性
/ 普遍性
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy AG Religious life; material religion HA Bible RD Hymnology |
| Further subjects: | B
Secularization
B political engagement B (choral) music B heritage studies B cultural festival |
| 在线阅读: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 总结: | This article discusses a case study focusing on the appropriation of psalms in the choral festival “150 Psalms”. The authors observe a complex relationship between the festival, in which the psalms are appropriated as heritage, and attitudes regarding the religious traditions in which the psalms are rooted. Authenticity, a key concept in the field of heritage and cultural memory studies, is an important quality of the appropriation; however, this authenticity appeared to be constructed in a wide range of ways. Participants of the festival made different, competing claims regarding (in)authenticity, relating to ‘beauty’, ‘humanness’, ‘religiousness’, ‘relationship with God(s)’, political relevance’, and ‘ambiguity’. Discussing how these authenticities work in different individuals’ appropriation, the authors show that an authenticity built upon values of ‘human universality’, promoted by the festival organization, seems to have replaced an authenticity built upon ‘religiousness’, which the organizers assign to the realm of non-universal, individual experience. By signaling this tension, the authors conclude that ‘authenticity’ is a notion which is far more complex than extant theories on processes of collective ‘canonization’ suggest. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-9419 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of contemporary religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2022.2094114 |