Drivers of Global CSR Integration and Local CSR Responsiveness: Evidence from Chinese MNEs
What drives Chinese MNEs’ global CSR integration and local CSR responsiveness? Drawing on institutional theory, we argue that both antecedents reflecting globally isomorphic patterns of adaptation and antecedents mirroring the distinct characteristics of China’s institutional context are relevant. W...
Autores principales: | ; ; |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2016
|
En: |
Business ethics quarterly
Año: 2016, Volumen: 26, Número: 3, Páginas: 317-345 |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Institutional Theory
B China B emerging-market MNEs B local CSR responsiveness B global CSR integration B State-owned enterprises |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Sumario: | What drives Chinese MNEs’ global CSR integration and local CSR responsiveness? Drawing on institutional theory, we argue that both antecedents reflecting globally isomorphic patterns of adaptation and antecedents mirroring the distinct characteristics of China’s institutional context are relevant. We support our argument using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis on a sample of 29 of China’s globally most influential companies. We find that state influence and global CSR associations affect global CSR integration, whereas presence in the West and internationalization through mergers and acquisitions predict local CSR responsiveness. Our study thus suggests that home-country characteristics are an important co-determinant of the CSR approaches of emerging-market MNEs. We further find that multicultural experience in top management teams is associated with both global CSR integration and local CSR responsiveness, supporting notions of transnational CSR. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2153-3326 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Business ethics quarterly
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/beq.2016.13 |