Barbour's Fourfold Way: Problems with His Taxonomy of Science-religion Relationships
In this paper several problems are raised concerning Ian Barbour's four ways of interrelating science and religion—Conflict, Independence, Dialogue, and Integration—as put forward in such publications as his highly influential Religion in an Age of Science (1990) and widely adopted by other wri...
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2001
|
Στο/Στη: |
Zygon
Έτος: 2001, Τόμος: 36, Τεύχος: 4, Σελίδες: 765-781 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Dialogue
B Conflict B Ενσωμάτωση <μοτίβο> B Independence B science-religion relationship B Ian Barbour |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Σύνοψη: | In this paper several problems are raised concerning Ian Barbour's four ways of interrelating science and religion—Conflict, Independence, Dialogue, and Integration—as put forward in such publications as his highly influential Religion in an Age of Science (1990) and widely adopted by other writers in this field. The authors argue that this taxonomy is not very useful or analytically helpful, especially to historians seeking to understand past engagements between science and religion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/0591-2385.00395 |