Barbour's Fourfold Way: Problems with His Taxonomy of Science-religion Relationships
In this paper several problems are raised concerning Ian Barbour's four ways of interrelating science and religion—Conflict, Independence, Dialogue, and Integration—as put forward in such publications as his highly influential Religion in an Age of Science (1990) and widely adopted by other wri...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2001
|
| Em: |
Zygon
Ano: 2001, Volume: 36, Número: 4, Páginas: 765-781 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Dialogue
B Conflict B Independence B science-religion relationship B Интеграция (мотив) B Ian Barbour |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | In this paper several problems are raised concerning Ian Barbour's four ways of interrelating science and religion—Conflict, Independence, Dialogue, and Integration—as put forward in such publications as his highly influential Religion in an Age of Science (1990) and widely adopted by other writers in this field. The authors argue that this taxonomy is not very useful or analytically helpful, especially to historians seeking to understand past engagements between science and religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/0591-2385.00395 |