McCauley, R. N. (2014). Explanatory Modesty: With James A. Van Slyke, “Religion Is Easy, but Science Is Hard . . . Understanding McCauley's Thesis”; Andrew Ali Aghapour, “Defining ‘Religion’ as Natural: A Critical Invitation to Robert McCauley”; Gregory R. Peterson, “On McCauley's Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not: Some Further Observations”; and Robert N. McCauley, “Explanatory Modesty.”. Zygon, 49(3), 728-740. doi:10.1111/zygo.12116
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationMcCauley, Robert N. "Explanatory Modesty: With James A. Van Slyke, “Religion Is Easy, but Science Is Hard . . . Understanding McCauley's Thesis”; Andrew Ali Aghapour, “Defining ‘Religion’ as Natural: A Critical Invitation to Robert McCauley”; Gregory R. Peterson, “On McCauley's Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not: Some Further Observations”; and Robert N. McCauley, “Explanatory Modesty.”." Zygon 49, no. 3 (2014): 728-740, https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12116.
MLA (8th ed.) CitationMcCauley, Robert N. "Explanatory Modesty: With James A. Van Slyke, “Religion Is Easy, but Science Is Hard . . . Understanding McCauley's Thesis”; Andrew Ali Aghapour, “Defining ‘Religion’ as Natural: A Critical Invitation to Robert McCauley”; Gregory R. Peterson, “On McCauley's Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not: Some Further Observations”; and Robert N. McCauley, “Explanatory Modesty.”." Zygon, vol. 49, no. 3, 2014, pp. 728-740, https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12116.