Pragmatic Neuroethics: Lived Experiences as a Source of Moral Knowledge
In this article, we present a pragmatic approach to neuroethics, referring back to John Dewey and his articulation of the “common good” and its discovery through systematic methods. Pragmatic neuroethics bridges philosophy and social sciences and, at a very basic level, considers that ethics is not...
Главные авторы: | ; |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2018
|
В: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Год: 2018, Том: 27, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 578-589 |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Morality
B Pragmatism B Moral Behavior B Young People B Neuroethics |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Итог: | In this article, we present a pragmatic approach to neuroethics, referring back to John Dewey and his articulation of the “common good” and its discovery through systematic methods. Pragmatic neuroethics bridges philosophy and social sciences and, at a very basic level, considers that ethics is not dissociable from lived experiences and everyday moral choices. We reflect on the integration between empirical methods and normative questions, using as our platform recent bioethical and neuropsychological research into moral cognition, action, and experience. Finally, we present the protocol of a study concerning teenagers’ morality in everyday life, discussing our epistemological choices as an example of a pragmatic approach in empirical ethics. We hope that this article conveys that even though the scope of neuroethics is broad, it is important not to move too far from the real life encounters that give rise to moral questions in the first place. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-2147 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0963180118000105 |