A Defense of Limited Regulation of Human Genetic Therapies

There is a role for regulatory oversight over new genetic technologies. Research must ensure the rights of human subjects, and all medical products and techniques should be ensured to be safe and effective. In the United States, these forms of regulation are largely the purview of the National Insti...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hughes, James J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2019
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 112-120
Further subjects:B Ethics
B germline
B Gene Therapy
B Bioethics
B heritable
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827965789
003 DE-627
005 20221220052629.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180118000440  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827965789 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827965789 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hughes, James J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Defense of Limited Regulation of Human Genetic Therapies 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There is a role for regulatory oversight over new genetic technologies. Research must ensure the rights of human subjects, and all medical products and techniques should be ensured to be safe and effective. In the United States, these forms of regulation are largely the purview of the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration. Some have argued, however, that human genetic therapies require new regulatory agencies empowered to enforce cultural norms, protect against hypothetical social harms, or ensure that the human genome remains unchanged. Focusing on the United States, this essay will briefly review these arguments and argue that the current limited regulatory role over human gene therapies is sufficient to protect public health, bodily autonomy, and reproductive freedom. 
601 |a Therapie 
650 4 |a Bioethics 
650 4 |a heritable 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a germline 
650 4 |a Gene Therapy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 28(2019), 1, Seite 112-120  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2019  |g number:1  |g pages:112-120 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180118000440  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/defense-of-limited-regulation-of-human-genetic-therapies/2AE3ADBDE246FB0B15A56D387C10E6BB  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 28  |j 2019  |e 1  |h 112-120 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235370693 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827965789 
LOK |0 005 20221220052629 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#255B9FEA2EEDECA5101C1EBF8AAAD49E0090EB60 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw