Assessing Decision-Making Capacity in Patients with Communication Impairments: A Case Study

The ethical principle of autonomy requires physicians to respect patient autonomy when present, and to protect the patient who lacks autonomy. Fulfilling this ethical obligation when a patient has a communication impairment presents considerable challenges. Standard methods for evaluating decision-m...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Pubblicato in:Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Autori: Cairncross, Molly (Autore) ; Peterson, Andrew (Autore) ; Lazosky, Andrea (Autore) ; Gofton, Teneille (Autore) ; Weijer, Charles (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Cambridge Univ. Press 2016
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Anno: 2016, Volume: 25, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 691-699
Altre parole chiave:B Ethics
B Neuropsychology
B Autonomy
B decision-making capacity
B brain trauma
B communication impairments
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:The ethical principle of autonomy requires physicians to respect patient autonomy when present, and to protect the patient who lacks autonomy. Fulfilling this ethical obligation when a patient has a communication impairment presents considerable challenges. Standard methods for evaluating decision-making capacity require a semistructured interview. Some patients with communication impairments are unable to engage in a semistructured interview and are at risk of the wrongful loss of autonomy. In this article, we present a general strategy for assessing decision-making capacity in patients with communication impairments. We derive this strategy by reflecting on a particular case. The strategy involves three steps: (1) determining the reliability of communication, (2) widening the bandwidth of communication, and (3) using compensatory measures of decision-making capacity. We argue that this strategy may be useful for assessing decision-making capacity and preserving autonomy in some patients with communication impairments.
ISSN:1469-2147
Comprende:Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0963180116000414