The Art of Misunderstanding Moral Bioenhancement: Two Cases
In our book Unfit for the Future and a number of papers, we have argued that there is a dangerous mismatch between, on the one hand, the tremendous power of scientific technology, which has created societies with millions of citizens, and, on the other hand, our moral capacities, which have been sha...
Autores principales: | ; |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2015
|
En: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Año: 2015, Volumen: 24, Número: 1, Páginas: 48-57 |
Otras palabras clave: | B
God Machine
B Agency B moral enhancement B Michael Hauskeller B John Harris B Autonomy B Robert Sparrow B Freedom B moral bioenhancement B Mejoramiento humano |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Sumario: | In our book Unfit for the Future and a number of papers, we have argued that there is a dangerous mismatch between, on the one hand, the tremendous power of scientific technology, which has created societies with millions of citizens, and, on the other hand, our moral capacities, which have been shaped by evolution for life in small, close-knit societies with primitive technology. To overcome this mismatch before it results in the downfall of human civilization, human beings stand in acute need of moral enhancement, not only by traditional means but also by biomedical means, should this turn out to be possible. After summarizing this argument, we respond to two critics, Michael Hauskeller and Robert Sparrow. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-2147 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0963180114000292 |