Why Is Therapeutic Misconception So Prevalent?

Therapeutic misconception (TM)—when clinical research participants fail to adequately grasp the difference between participating in a clinical trial and receiving ordinary clinical care—has long been recognized as a significant problem in consent to clinical trials. We suggest that TM does not prima...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Lidz, Charles W. (Автор) ; Albert, Karen (Автор) ; Appelbaum, Paul (Автор) ; Dunn, Laura B. (Автор) ; Overton, Eve (Автор) ; Pivovarova, Ekaterina (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Cambridge Univ. Press 2015
В: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Год: 2015, Том: 24, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 231-241
Другие ключевые слова:B therapeutic misconception
B Informed Consent
B research ethics
B Clinical Trials
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Описание
Итог:Therapeutic misconception (TM)—when clinical research participants fail to adequately grasp the difference between participating in a clinical trial and receiving ordinary clinical care—has long been recognized as a significant problem in consent to clinical trials. We suggest that TM does not primarily reflect inadequate disclosure or participants’ incompetence. Instead, TM arises from divergent primary cognitive frames. The researchers’ frame places the clinical trial in the context of scientific designs for assessing intervention efficacy. In contrast, most participants have a cognitive frame that is personal and focused primarily on their medical problems. To illustrate this, we draw on interview material from both clinical researchers and participants in clinical trials. We suggest that reducing TM requires encouraging subjects to adjust their frame, not just add information to their existing frame. What is necessary is a scientific reframing of participation in a clinical trial.
ISSN:1469-2147
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S096318011400053X