Just Better Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism could still be a viable moral and political theory, although an emphasis on justice as distributing burdens and benefits has hidden this from current conversations. The traditional counterexamples prove that we have good grounds for rejecting classical, aggregative forms of consequent...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Häyry, Matti (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2021
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 343-367
Further subjects:B nonhuman animals
B Climate Change
B Utilitarianism
B liberal utilitarianism
B Consequentialism
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827986506
003 DE-627
005 20221220052701.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180120000882  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827986506 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827986506 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Häyry, Matti  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Just Better Utilitarianism 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Utilitarianism could still be a viable moral and political theory, although an emphasis on justice as distributing burdens and benefits has hidden this from current conversations. The traditional counterexamples prove that we have good grounds for rejecting classical, aggregative forms of consequentialism. A nonaggregative, liberal form of utilitarianism is immune to this rejection. The cost is that it cannot adjudicate when the basic needs of individuals or groups are in conflict. Cases like this must be solved by other methods. This is not a weakness in liberal utilitarianism, on the contrary. The theory clarifies what we should admit to begin with: that ethical doctrines do not have universally acceptable solutions to all difficult problems or hard cases. The theory also reminds us that not all problems are in this sense difficult or cases hard. We could alleviate the plight of nonhuman animals by reducing meat eating. We could mitigate climate change and its detrimental effects by choosing better ways of living. These would imply that most people’s desire satisfaction would be partly frustrated, but liberal utilitarianism holds that this would be justified by the satisfaction of the basic needs of other people and nonhuman animals. 
650 4 |a Climate Change 
650 4 |a nonhuman animals 
650 4 |a liberal utilitarianism 
650 4 |a Consequentialism 
650 4 |a Utilitarianism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 30(2021), 2, Seite 343-367  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:343-367 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180120000882  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/just-better-utilitarianism/7A424C37D9FBA0F32B780C7010C818FB  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 30  |j 2021  |e 2  |h 343-367 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235391410 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827986506 
LOK |0 005 20221220052701 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#98CD188484A417C87D8AA130D72CADD6407F3184 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw