Multiple Religious Belonging: Conceptual Advance or Secularization Denial?
This paper critically examines the notion of ‘multiple religious belonging’ (MRB). Through an analysis of a recent study by Joantine Berghuijs, it argues that MRB is ill-defined and exaggerates the extent of popular religiosity. If MRB is at all common, then the de-legitimating effect of religious p...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
De Gruyter
2017
|
В: |
Open theology
Год: 2017, Том: 3, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 603-612 |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Secularization
B consumerist religion B Multiple Religious Belonging |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Итог: | This paper critically examines the notion of ‘multiple religious belonging’ (MRB). Through an analysis of a recent study by Joantine Berghuijs, it argues that MRB is ill-defined and exaggerates the extent of popular religiosity. If MRB is at all common, then the de-legitimating effect of religious pluralism (which is well-supported by the evidence) is challenged. This paper suggests that such a challenge is unwarranted by Berghuijs’s evidence and concludes with an elaboration of the various and very different things that might be encompassed by MRB. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2300-6579 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Open theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/opth-2017-0047 |