Arguing for Atonement?
According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his the...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
2022
|
| Em: |
TheoLogica
Ano: 2022, Volume: 6, Número: 2, Páginas: 271-282 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | NBC Deus NBK Soteriologia VA Filosofia VB Hermenêutica ; Filosofia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Abstract Objects
B Atonement B Aseity B Platonism B Nominalism |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1831436914 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230621123246.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230118s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.14428/thl.v6i2.63473 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1831436914 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1831436914 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1069562556 |0 (DE-627)822010461 |0 (DE-576)185018750 |4 aut |a Davis, Richard Brian |d 1963- | |
| 109 | |a Davis, Richard Brian 1963- |a Davis, Richard B. 1963- |a Davis, Richard 1963- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Arguing for Atonement? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his theological stance on the atonement. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Abstract Objects | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aseity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Atonement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nominalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Platonism | |
| 652 | |a NBC:NBK:VA:VB | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t TheoLogica |d Louvain-la-Neuve : Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain, 2017 |g 6(2022), 2, Seite 271-282 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)1662480458 |w (DE-600)2967603-4 |x 2593-0265 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g pages:271-282 |
| 856 | |u https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/download/63473/61533 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v6i2.63473 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/63473 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 6 |j 2022 |e 2 |h 271-282 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4249570576 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1831436914 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230627091140 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230118||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205381X |a VB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052325 |a NBK | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||