RT Article
T1 Arguing for Atonement?
JF TheoLogica
VO 6
IS 2
SP 271
OP 282
A1 Davis, Richard Brian 1963-
LA English
PB Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
YR 2022
UL https://www.ixtheo.de/Record/1831436914
AB According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his theological stance on the atonement.
K1 Abstract Objects
K1 Aseity
K1 Atonement
K1 Nominalism
K1 Platonism
DO 10.14428/thl.v6i2.63473