Arguing for Atonement?
According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his the...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
2022
|
| En: |
TheoLogica
Año: 2022, Volumen: 6, Número: 2, Páginas: 271-282 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | NBC Dios NBK Soteriología VA Filosofía VB Hermenéutica ; Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Abstract Objects
B Atonement B Aseity B Platonism B Nominalism |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his theological stance on the atonement. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v6i2.63473 |