Arguing for Atonement?
According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his the...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
2022
|
| In: |
TheoLogica
Anno: 2022, Volume: 6, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 271-282 |
| Notazioni IxTheo: | NBC Dio NBK Soteriologia VA Filosofia VB Ermeneutica; Filosofia |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Abstract Objects
B Atonement B Aseity B Platonism B Nominalism |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Riepilogo: | According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his theological stance on the atonement. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v6i2.63473 |