Naturalism, classical theism, and first causes
Enric F. Gel has recently argued that classical theism enjoys a significant advantage over Graham Oppy's naturalism. According to Gel, classical theism - unlike Oppy's naturalism - satisfactorily answers two questions: first, how many first causes are there, and second, why is it that numb...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2023, Volume: 59, Issue: 1, Pages: 63-77 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theism
/ Naturalism (Philosophy)
/ Cosmological proof of God's existence
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Further subjects: | B
first cause
B Naturalism B Classical Theism B God B gap problem |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1833278771 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230802153734.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230206s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412522000051 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1833278771 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1833278771 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1258294478 |0 (DE-627)1804282251 |4 aut |a Schmid, Joseph C. | |
109 | |a Schmid, Joseph C. |a Schmid, Joseph | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Naturalism, classical theism, and first causes |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Enric F. Gel has recently argued that classical theism enjoys a significant advantage over Graham Oppy's naturalism. According to Gel, classical theism - unlike Oppy's naturalism - satisfactorily answers two questions: first, how many first causes are there, and second, why is it that number rather than another? In this article, I reply to Gel's argument for classical theism's advantage over Oppy's naturalism. I also draw out wider implications of my investigation for the gap problem and Christian doctrine along the way. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Classical Theism | |
650 | 4 | |a first cause | |
650 | 4 | |a gap problem | |
650 | 4 | |a God | |
650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4171303-5 |0 (DE-627)105395846 |0 (DE-576)209936037 |2 gnd |a Naturalismus |g Philosophie |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4165372-5 |0 (DE-627)105440604 |0 (DE-576)209894989 |2 gnd |a Kosmologischer Gottesbeweis |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 59(2023), 1, Seite 63-77 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:63-77 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000051 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/naturalism-classical-theism-and-first-causes/C8B373E5EA8C6AC0D386DD247AB92803 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
936 | u | w | |d 59 |j 2023 |e 1 |h 63-77 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4267583102 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1833278771 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230802153734 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmological proof of God's existence,Cosmological argument,God's existence,Theism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Preuve cosmologique de l’existence de Dieu,Argument cosmologique,Argument cosmologique,Théisme |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Prueba cosmológica de la existencia de Dios,Teísmo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Prova cosmologica dell'esistenza di Dio,Argomento cosmologico,Argomento cosmologico,Teismo |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 有神论,神存在的宇宙论论证,上帝存在的宇宙论论证 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 有神論,神存在的宇宙論論証,上帝存在的宇宙論論証 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Prova cosmológica da existência de Deus,Teísmo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Космологическое доказательство бытия Бога,Теизм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεϊσμός,Κοσμολογική απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Kosmologisches Argument |