Die Plausibilität des Evangeliums und widerständige Theologie: 11 Thesen

In 11 theses the author distinguishes between the plausibility of the gospel as an effect of divine action, which enables human action, and the tendency of affirmation or disaffirmation of the gospel, which relies on human social work. Whereas humans can only contribute to the plausibility of the go...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Mühling, Markus 1969- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Allemand
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2023
Dans: Kerygma und Dogma
Année: 2023, Volume: 69, Numéro: 1, Pages: 91-98
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Évangile / Plausibilité / Théologie
Classifications IxTheo:CH Christianisme et société
FA Théologie
NAB Théologie fondamentale
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:In 11 theses the author distinguishes between the plausibility of the gospel as an effect of divine action, which enables human action, and the tendency of affirmation or disaffirmation of the gospel, which relies on human social work. Whereas humans can only contribute to the plausibility of the gospel if they refreign from producing plausibility, they are able to further plausibility as a social tendency of affirmation or disaffirmation by explicating the gospel. However, a deeper look reveals that it is actually a social environment of disaffirmation that supports an explication of the gospel that satisfies theological standards, since it furthers a theology of resistance. As such, the present situation of social disaffirmation in north-western societies is no reason for lament, but should be taken as an opportunity for explicating the gospel in a way that encourages a theology of resistance.
ISSN:2196-8020
Contient:Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2023.69.1.91