Patient autonomy and withholding information

Disclosure in clinical practice is aimed at promoting patient autonomy, usually culminating in patient choice (e.g., to consent to an operation or not, or between different medications). In medical ethics, there is an implicit background assumption that knowing more about (X) automatically translate...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rees, Melissa (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2023
In: Bioethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 37, Issue: 3, Pages: 256-264
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B Consent
B Understanding
B Autonomy
B Information
B Disclosure
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1836297068
003 DE-627
005 20230418205537.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230216s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.13130  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1836297068 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1836297068 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rees, Melissa  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Patient autonomy and withholding information 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Disclosure in clinical practice is aimed at promoting patient autonomy, usually culminating in patient choice (e.g., to consent to an operation or not, or between different medications). In medical ethics, there is an implicit background assumption that knowing more about (X) automatically translates to greater, or more genuine, autonomy with respect to one's choices involving (X). I challenge this assumption by arguing that in rare cases, withholding information can promote a patient's autonomy (understood as the capacity for rational choice in alignment with one's values and goals). 
601 |a Patient 
601 |a Autonomie 
650 4 |a Understanding 
650 4 |a Information 
650 4 |a Disclosure 
650 4 |a Consent 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
652 |a NBE:NCH 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 37(2023), 3, Seite 256-264  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g pages:256-264 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/REEPAA-4.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13130  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.13130  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 37  |j 2023  |e 3  |h 256-264 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4272714813 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1836297068 
LOK |0 005 20230418205537 
LOK |0 008 230216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-02-15#4FFD97C4B757B83EA005207D63D9499F8725EED4 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Information 
STB 0 0 |a Information 
STC 0 0 |a Información 
STD 0 0 |a Informazione 
STE 0 0 |a 信息,信息 
STF 0 0 |a 信息,資訊 
STG 0 0 |a Informação 
STH 0 0 |a Информация 
STI 0 0 |a Πληροφορία 
SYE 0 0 |a Informationswesen