RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND REVELATION
Revelation is always understood in contrast to man's natural religious experience. The problem whether there is real opposition between natural and revealed religious experience is often discussed in the Christian theological tradition, especially in the context of the comparative study of reli...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Dharmaram College
1988
|
Em: |
Journal of Dharma
Ano: 1988, Volume: 13, Número: 4, Páginas: 328-350 |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Revealing Experience
B Religious Experience B Immediate Experience B Integral Experience B Revelation B History B Reason |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Resumo: | Revelation is always understood in contrast to man's natural religious experience. The problem whether there is real opposition between natural and revealed religious experience is often discussed in the Christian theological tradition, especially in the context of the comparative study of religions. In this paper I propose to examine S. Radhakrishnan's attempt to reconcile the conflict between natural religious experience and revelation. The main ideas of the author are brought under four main heads: 1) Religious experience; 2) Its Nature; 3) The content of Religious Experience. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0253-7222 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal of Dharma
|