How Sinful Is Sin? How Vicious Is Vice? A Modest Defense of the Guise of the Good
We defend the guise of the good thesis in a tradition going back to Socrates and Plato, according to which persons act on the basis of what appears to them as good or the least bad or evil act available to them. This seems contrary to moral experience, but we defend the thesis against plausible coun...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
2023
|
| Dans: |
TheoLogica
Année: 2023, Volume: 7, Numéro: 2, Pages: 1-15 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | KAB Christianisme primitif KAJ Époque contemporaine NCA Éthique TB Antiquité VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Moral Realism
B Socrates B Subjectivism B Bernard Williams B Plato |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | We defend the guise of the good thesis in a tradition going back to Socrates and Plato, according to which persons act on the basis of what appears to them as good or the least bad or evil act available to them. This seems contrary to moral experience, but we defend the thesis against plausible counter-examples in life as well as fiction. We contend that the thesis makes wrong-doing and vice intelligible, but still wrong, dysfunctional and horrific. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v7i2.66163 |