Bringing Philo Home: Responses to Harry A. Wolfson’s Philo (1947) in the Aftermath of World War II

In 1947 Harry Austryn Wolfson published his massive and revisionary Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. With the book, Wolfson aimed at proving that Philo was an innovative and highly influential philosopher—by no means an isolated Jew of no consequence to...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Bloch, René S. 1969- (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Έκδοση: Cambridge Univ. Press 2023
Στο/Στη: Harvard theological review
Έτος: 2023, Τόμος: 116, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 466-489
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών:B Wolfson, Harry Austryn 1887-1974, Philo / Philo, Alexandrinus 25 π.Χ.-40 / Εβραϊκή φιλοσοφία / Αποδοχή (μοτίβο) / Ιστορία (μοτίβο) 1947-1980
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo:ΒΗ Ιουδαϊσμός
HD Πρώιμος Ιουδαϊσμός
ΤΒ Αρχαιότητα 
ΤΚ Σύγχρονη Εποχή
VA Φιλοσοφία
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B Philo of Alexandria
B Hebrew
B Harry A. Wolfson
B Hellenistic Judaism
B Antisemitism
B World War II
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:In 1947 Harry Austryn Wolfson published his massive and revisionary Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. With the book, Wolfson aimed at proving that Philo was an innovative and highly influential philosopher—by no means an isolated Jew of no consequence to the history of philosophy. As becomes clear from numerous letters written to Wolfson on the occasion of the publication of the book and stored at the Harvard University Archives, for Jewish readers Wolfson’s proposed rehabilitation of Philo could provide a point of orientation. It served as a source of comfort and of pride in the post-war years. While the main thesis of Wolfson’s book, Philo as the precursor of medieval philosophy, was rejected by most scholars of Philo and ancient philosophy, the letters and notes discussed in this article show that much more was at stake than a purely academic discussion.
ISSN:1475-4517
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S001781602300024X