Bringing Philo Home: Responses to Harry A. Wolfson’s Philo (1947) in the Aftermath of World War II
In 1947 Harry Austryn Wolfson published his massive and revisionary Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. With the book, Wolfson aimed at proving that Philo was an innovative and highly influential philosopher—by no means an isolated Jew of no consequence to...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| Dans: |
Harvard theological review
Année: 2023, Volume: 116, Numéro: 3, Pages: 466-489 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Wolfson, Harry Austryn 1887-1974, Philo
/ Philo, Alexandrinus 25 avant J.-C.-40
/ Philosophie juive
/ Réception <scientifique>
/ Histoire 1947-1980
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | BH Judaïsme HD Judaïsme ancien TB Antiquité TK Époque contemporaine VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Philo of Alexandria
B Hebrew B Harry A. Wolfson B Hellenistic Judaism B Antisemitism B World War II |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | In 1947 Harry Austryn Wolfson published his massive and revisionary Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. With the book, Wolfson aimed at proving that Philo was an innovative and highly influential philosopher—by no means an isolated Jew of no consequence to the history of philosophy. As becomes clear from numerous letters written to Wolfson on the occasion of the publication of the book and stored at the Harvard University Archives, for Jewish readers Wolfson’s proposed rehabilitation of Philo could provide a point of orientation. It served as a source of comfort and of pride in the post-war years. While the main thesis of Wolfson’s book, Philo as the precursor of medieval philosophy, was rejected by most scholars of Philo and ancient philosophy, the letters and notes discussed in this article show that much more was at stake than a purely academic discussion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S001781602300024X |