Bringing Philo Home: Responses to Harry A. Wolfson’s Philo (1947) in the Aftermath of World War II

In 1947 Harry Austryn Wolfson published his massive and revisionary Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. With the book, Wolfson aimed at proving that Philo was an innovative and highly influential philosopher—by no means an isolated Jew of no consequence to...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bloch, René S. 1969- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Cambridge Univ. Press 2023
Em: Harvard theological review
Ano: 2023, Volume: 116, Número: 3, Páginas: 466-489
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Wolfson, Harry Austryn 1887-1974, Philo / Philo, Alexandrinus 25 a.C.-40 / Filosofia judaica / Recepção / História 1947-1980
Classificações IxTheo:BH Judaísmo
HD Judaísmo primitivo
TB Antiguidade
TK Período contemporâneo
VA Filosofia
Outras palavras-chave:B Philo of Alexandria
B Hebrew
B Harry A. Wolfson
B Hellenistic Judaism
B Antisemitism
B World War II
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:In 1947 Harry Austryn Wolfson published his massive and revisionary Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. With the book, Wolfson aimed at proving that Philo was an innovative and highly influential philosopher—by no means an isolated Jew of no consequence to the history of philosophy. As becomes clear from numerous letters written to Wolfson on the occasion of the publication of the book and stored at the Harvard University Archives, for Jewish readers Wolfson’s proposed rehabilitation of Philo could provide a point of orientation. It served as a source of comfort and of pride in the post-war years. While the main thesis of Wolfson’s book, Philo as the precursor of medieval philosophy, was rejected by most scholars of Philo and ancient philosophy, the letters and notes discussed in this article show that much more was at stake than a purely academic discussion.
ISSN:1475-4517
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S001781602300024X