Artificial Pastoral Care: Abdication, Delegation or Collaboration?
This article considers the relationship between Christian pastoral care and Artificial Intelligence systems. Four aspects are identified from definitions of pastoral care: the horizon of contingency in mortality, the role of wisdom rather than mere information, the oppressive and/or liberatory poten...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Sage
2023
|
| В: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Год: 2023, Том: 36, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 660-674 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | NBE Антропология NCJ Научная этика RB Священнослужители RG Душепопечительство ZG Media studies; Digital media; Communication studies |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Good Samaritan
B Transhumanism B Wisdom B Pastoral Care B Artificial Intelligence B Empathy |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | This article considers the relationship between Christian pastoral care and Artificial Intelligence systems. Four aspects are identified from definitions of pastoral care: the horizon of contingency in mortality, the role of wisdom rather than mere information, the oppressive and/or liberatory potential of AI and the importance of empathic presence. In rejecting a transhumanist argument that mental processes are substrate-independent, it is contended that pastoral carers embrace, rather than seeking to circumvent, their crucial finitude in being humans who care. A distinction is drawn between probabilistic reasoning and judgement in retaining a vital place for decision-making that is social. Whilst not eschewing value in AI systems, this article argues for critical evaluation of technologically framed contributions to addressing barriers to people's participation. The importance of empathy is highlighted—in the light of claims not only of robotic mimicry but of interindividual models of emotion. It is concluded that the notion of artificial care be ruled out although the possibilities of AI-assisted care are not dismissed. Opportunities for humans to abdicate from the responsibilities to care, in favour of AI substitutes, are deemed to be best avoided. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/09539468231179571 |