The Receiver’s Paradox: Agency and Essence in John 13:20
The Gospel of John contains not only paradoxical thought but also formal paradoxes—short logical riddles of a kind put to rhetorical use by ancient speakers. One overlooked formal paradox is the aphorism in John 13:20. The evangelist models this paradox on a reversal of the logic of Heraclitus’s riv...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Catholic Biblical Association of America
2023
|
| Em: |
The catholic biblical quarterly
Ano: 2023, Volume: 85, Número: 1, Páginas: 97-109 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Bibel. Johannesevangelium 13,20
B Heraclitus, Ephesius 550 a.C.-480 a.C. B Paradoxo |
| Classificações IxTheo: | HC Novo Testamento |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Paradox
B Heraclitus B Agency B Gospel of John B Jesus B athleticism B riddle |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | The Gospel of John contains not only paradoxical thought but also formal paradoxes—short logical riddles of a kind put to rhetorical use by ancient speakers. One overlooked formal paradox is the aphorism in John 13:20. The evangelist models this paradox on a reversal of the logic of Heraclitus’s river paradox. While Heraclitus’s river paradox is a means to deliberate essence, Jesus’s "receiver’s paradox" is a means to deliberate agency. Jesus intends the paradox as a way to help the disciples reflect further on their concerns for mission. As a result, this interpretation alleviates concerns that the utterance is unrelated to the discourse. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2163-2529 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: The catholic biblical quarterly
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/cbq.2023.0005 |