A Poem in Two Contexts: Psalm 40:14–18 and Psalm 70 in their Canonical Setting
That Psalms 40:14-18 and 70 are (near) duplicates is well known. Previous research on these psalms has tended to focus on the question of origin, debating which was the original source for the other, with this then used to explain the variances between them, usually with the goal of establishing the...
| Otros títulos: | Festschrift for Gert Prinsloo |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Unisa Press
2022
|
| En: |
Journal for semitics
Año: 2022, Volumen: 31, Número: 2, Páginas: 1-12 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Bibel. Psalmen 40,14-18
/ Bibel. Psalmen 70
/ Doblete
/ Contexto
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | BH Judaísmo HB Antiguo Testamento |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Psalms
B Libro en homenaje B Prinsloo, Gert T. M. B canonical shaping B Text Criticism |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Sumario: | That Psalms 40:14-18 and 70 are (near) duplicates is well known. Previous research on these psalms has tended to focus on the question of origin, debating which was the original source for the other, with this then used to explain the variances between them, usually with the goal of establishing the original poem. This paper takes a different approach, arguing that the variances between the two are to be explained as evidence of shaping each to its current setting. These variances thus contribute to subtle changes in meaning between them which need to be recognised. |
|---|---|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Journal for semitics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.25159/2663-6573/12042 |