A Poem in Two Contexts: Psalm 40:14–18 and Psalm 70 in their Canonical Setting
That Psalms 40:14-18 and 70 are (near) duplicates is well known. Previous research on these psalms has tended to focus on the question of origin, debating which was the original source for the other, with this then used to explain the variances between them, usually with the goal of establishing the...
| Другие заглавия: | Festschrift for Gert Prinsloo |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Другие авторы: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Unisa Press
2022
|
| В: |
Journal for semitics
Год: 2022, Том: 31, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 1-12 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Bibel. Psalmen 40,14-18
/ Bibel. Psalmen 70
/ Языковой дублет
/ Контекст
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | BH Иудаизм HB Ветхий Завет |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Psalms
B Prinsloo, Gert T. M. B canonical shaping B Памятное издание B Text Criticism |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | That Psalms 40:14-18 and 70 are (near) duplicates is well known. Previous research on these psalms has tended to focus on the question of origin, debating which was the original source for the other, with this then used to explain the variances between them, usually with the goal of establishing the original poem. This paper takes a different approach, arguing that the variances between the two are to be explained as evidence of shaping each to its current setting. These variances thus contribute to subtle changes in meaning between them which need to be recognised. |
|---|---|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal for semitics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.25159/2663-6573/12042 |