Lässt sich der Geist kommentieren?: Zu neuen kommentarischen Werken zu Hegel und Adorno

Over the last few years, a number of research works on Hegel and Adorno have appeared that conceive of themselves as "commentaries". This article offers a critical discussion of these commentaries, focusing on the different forms these commentaries have and dealing with the question of how...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oehl, Thomas (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Mohr Siebeck 2023
In: Philosophische Rundschau
Year: 2023, Volume: 70, Issue: 3, Pages: 267-325
IxTheo Classification:TJ Modern history
TK Recent history
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Commentary
B Book review
B Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1770-1831)
B Adorno, Theodor W (1903-1969)
B Spirit
B Forme
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1861140495
003 DE-627
005 20240117123714.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231010s2023 xx |||||oo 00| ||ger c
024 7 |a 10.1628/phr-2023-0026  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1861140495 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1861140495 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ger 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
084 |a 07  |2 bwlb 
100 1 |a Oehl, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Lässt sich der Geist kommentieren?  |b Zu neuen kommentarischen Werken zu Hegel und Adorno 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Sammelrezension 
520 |a Over the last few years, a number of research works on Hegel and Adorno have appeared that conceive of themselves as "commentaries". This article offers a critical discussion of these commentaries, focusing on the different forms these commentaries have and dealing with the question of how they relate to the form of philosophical thinking (in Hegel and Adorno) - and, consequently, to the form of Spirit itself. It turns out that these forms of commentary are, in some crucial aspects, adequate to this form, which allots a significant role in the history of reception of Hegel's and Adorno's philosophy to them. This is the case even though some anti-metaphysical prejudices of our present time spill over into some of these commentaries: due to the contrast to the original texts all commentaries qua commentary bind themselves to, the gap between these prejudices and the content of the texts itself is revealed, whereas it can remain concealed in different forms of philosophical writing (e.g. in research papers or monographs).Georg W. Bertram, Hegels "Phänomenologie des Geistes". Ein systematischer Kommentar. Stuttgart: Reclam, 2017/2021. 343 S. Anne Eusterschulte/Sebastian Tränkle (Hrsg.), Theodor W. Adorno: Ästhetische Theorie [Klassiker Auslegen Bd. 74]. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. X, 304 S. Gunnar Hindrichs (Hrsg.), Max Horkheimer/Theodor W. Adorno: Dialektik der Aufklärung [Klassiker Auslegen Bd. 63]. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2017. IX, 213 S. Michael Quante/Nadine Mooren (Hrsg.), Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, 2018. IX, 805 S. Birgit Sandkaulen (Hrsg.), G. W. F. Hegel: Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik [Klassiker Auslegen Bd. 40]. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2018. X, 276 S. Pirmin Stekeler, Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Ein dialogischer Kommentar [3 Bände]. Hamburg: Meiner, 2020 ff. 1296 S., 1008 S., 1196 S. 
600 1 7 |0 (DE-588)118547739  |0 (DE-627)133763331  |0 (DE-576)208952438  |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich  |d 1770-1831  |2 gnd  |7 (dpeaa)DE-631 
600 1 7 |0 (DE-588)118500775  |0 (DE-627)135597838  |0 (DE-576)160030862  |a Adorno, Theodor W  |d 1903-1969  |2 gnd  |7 (dpeaa)DE-631 
601 |a Kommentar 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4136710-8  |0 (DE-627)104500719  |0 (DE-576)209671467  |a Kommentar  |2 gnd  |7 (dpeaa)DE-631 
650 4 |a Commentary 
650 4 |a Form 
650 4 |a Spirit 
652 |a TJ:TK:VA 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophische Rundschau  |d Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 1953  |g 70(2023), 3, Seite 267-325  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)55757630X  |w (DE-600)2405336-3  |w (DE-576)27773407X  |x 1868-7261  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:70  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g pages:267-325 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1628/phr-2023-0026  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BWLB 
936 u w |d 70  |j 2023  |e 3  |h 267-325 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4383216412 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1861140495 
LOK |0 005 20231219204108 
LOK |0 008 231010||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053909  |a TJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053887  |a TK 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Commentary,Forme,Form,Form 
STB 0 0 |a Commentaire,Forme,Forme,Forme 
STC 0 0 |a Comentario,Forma,Forma,Forma 
STD 0 0 |a Commento,Forma,Forma,Forma 
STE 0 0 |a 形式,形状,形态,注释,解释,评注 
STF 0 0 |a 形式,形狀,形態,注釋,解釋,評注 
STG 0 0 |a Comentário,Forma,Forma,Forma 
STH 0 0 |a Комментарий,Форма (логика),Форма (философия),Форма 
STI 0 0 |a Μορφή (λογική),Μορφή (φιλοσοφία),Μορφή,Σχόλιο 
SUB |a REL 
SYA 0 0 |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friederich,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg Wilhelm F.,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg W.,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg Vilhelm-Fridrix,1770-1831,Hegel, G. V. F.,1770-1831,Hegel, G.,1770-1831,Hegel, Wilhelm Friedrich Georg,1770-1831,Hegel, Wilhelm Friedrich,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm,1770-1831,Hegel, G. F. W.,1770-1831,Hegel, G. Fr. W.,1770-1831,Hegel, György Vilmos Frigyes,1770-1831,Hegel, Jorge Guillermo Federico,1770-1831,Hegel, Giorgio G. F.,1770-1831,Hegel, Giorgio,1770-1831,Hegel, Geʾorg Ṿilhelm Fridrikh,1770-1831,Hegel, Georgius Wilhelmus Fridericus,1770-1831,Hegel, Georgius Wilhelmus,1770-1831,Hegel, Georgius Guilelmus Fridericus,1770-1831,Hegel, P'ŭridŭrihi,1770-1831,Hegel,1770-1831,Chegel, G. V. Fr.,1770-1831,Chenkel,1770-1831,Gegelʹ, G. V. F.,1770-1831,Gegelʹ, Fridrich,1770-1831,Gegelʹ, Georg Vilʹgelʹm Fridrich,1770-1831,Gegelj, Georg Vilʹgelʹm Fridrich,1770-1831,Hegeli, Georg Vilhelm Pʹridrix,1770-1831,Hėgelis, Georgas,1770-1831,Heġel', Ġeorġ Vil'hel'm Fridrich,1770-1831,Hēgeru, G. W. F.,1770-1831,Hēgeru,1770-1831,Hegelos,1770-1831,Egelos,1770-1831,Higil,1770-1831,Ḥīǧal,1770-1831,Hīġil, Ġiyūrġ Filhilm Fridrīš,1770-1831,Hīġil,1770-1831,Hīǧil,1770-1831,Hei ge er,1770-1831,Heigeer,1770-1831,Hēgeru,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg,1770-1831,Hegel, G. W. Friedrich,1770-1831,Hegel, G. W. F.,1770-1831,Hegel, Friedrich,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg Vilhelm Fridrih,1770-1831,Hegel, Georgius W.,1770-1831,Chegel,1770-1831,Chegel, Georg Vilchelm Fridrich,1770-1831,Chenkel, Gkeornk,1770-1831,Heige'er,1770-1831,Hegel, P'µuridµurihi,1770-1831,Gegel', G. V. F.,1770-1831,Gegel', Georg Vil'gel'm Fridrich,1770-1831,Hγegelis, Georgas,1770-1831,Hegel, Wilhelm F.,1770-1831,Higil, G. W. F.,1770-1831,Gegelʹ, Georg Vilʹgelm,1770-1831,Hegel, Federico Guillermo,1770-1831,Hegel, Geoleukeu Bilhelleum Peulideulihi,1770-1831,He gel, Ge o leu keu Bil hel leum Peu li deu li hi,1770-1831,Hehelʹ, Heorh Vilʹhelʹm Fridrich,1770-1831 
SYE 0 0 |a Kommentare , Logische Form