The ‘Galilean Q Community’ and the Orientalist Legacy in 2DH Scholarship

Contemporary Q scholarship imagines the existence of a ‘Galilean Q Community’ furnished with a simple religious piety standing over against Judean/Jerusalem-centered Judaism with its narrow ethnic particularism, its cult ritualism, and its scribal legalism. The ‘Galilean Q community’ plays the same...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Kirk, Alan (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage 2023
Dans: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Année: 2023, Volume: 46, Numéro: 2, Pages: 216-232
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Problème synoptique / Logienquelle / Soufisme / Soufi / Orientalisme (Sciences culturelles) / Histoire intellectuelle / Histoire des idées
Classifications IxTheo:BJ Islam
HC Nouveau Testament
TJ Époque moderne
TK Époque contemporaine
Sujets non-standardisés:B two-document hypothesis
B Natural Religion
B Q hypothesis
B Orientalism
B Source Criticism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Contemporary Q scholarship imagines the existence of a ‘Galilean Q Community’ furnished with a simple religious piety standing over against Judean/Jerusalem-centered Judaism with its narrow ethnic particularism, its cult ritualism, and its scribal legalism. The ‘Galilean Q community’ plays the same role vis-à-vis Judean Judaism in the imaginary of contemporary Q scholarship that Sufi Islam does in past and present western Orientalist discourses on Islam: in G. A. Lipton’s words, as embodying ‘a type of philosophical Protestantism freed from all outward prescriptions of religious law’, as an ‘Oriental version of a Kantian universal faith’ over against Islamic orthodoxy, which is Semitic, legalistic, obsessed with Sharia, dogmatic, ritualistic, intolerant, coercive, and politicized. This essay explores the roots of this Orientalist paradigm in nineteenth-century Synoptic source criticism and its continued influence in circles of 2DH scholarship.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X231209006